Logo
International Journal of
Gynaecology and Obstetrics Research
ARCHIVES
VOL. 7, ISSUE 2 (2025)
A cross- sectional study on psychological status of couples with infertility-related stress, and dyadic coping as predictors of quality of life
Authors
Bhavya A P, Divya A P, Rukmani Gharpinde
Abstract

Background: Globally, 1 in 6 people experience infertility, affecting approximately 182 million people which includes around 55 million men and 110 million women. The highest rates of infertility were observed in East and South Asia, Eastern Europe. In India, there are approximately 22–23 million infertile couples, showing the urgent need to increase access to affordable, high- quality fertility care for those in need. Infertility and its treatment can negatively influence the couple’s psychological well-being which in turn could affect their fertility and treatment outcome.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 150 couples (300 participants) who were selected through convenient sampling technique. The Fertility Problem Inventory, Dyadic Coping Inventory, and FertiQoL were used to measure infertility-related stress, dyadic coping and QoL. The Bodenmann’s dyadic coping theory was used to analyse the effects of infertility as a dyadic stressor affecting both partners and to know how they cope together for better QoL.

Objective: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to explore the relationship between infertility-related stress and dyadic coping with quality of life (QoL) in couples with infertility issues, and verify gender differences and dyadic interactions in association between them.

Results: The study revealed that female patients perceived significantly lower levels of QoL and dyadic coping than those of husbands. There was no statistically significant difference in the infertility-related stress between wives and husbands. Husband’s infertility-related stress had actor and partner effects on their own and their wives’ QoL, while wives’ infertility-related stress only had an actor effect on their own QoL. Husbands’ dyadic coping had both actor effect and partner effects on their own and their wives’ QoL, meanwhile wives’ dyadic coping had both actor effect and partner effects on their own and their husbands’ QoL.

Conclusion: The current study revealed that husbands’ life quality is influenced by their own infertility-related stress, dyadic coping, and their wives’ dyadic coping. On the other hand, wives’ life quality is affected by infertility-related stress and dyadic coping from both themselves and their husbands. Therefore, infertility-related stress and dyadic coping in couples with infertility issues can serve as valuable indicators for predicting quality of life. The findings may also have relevant implications for healthcare team specifically ART clinical staffs. The study also shows relationship between good psychological well-being and couples’ quality of life, highlighting the need for early interventions for better treatment outcome. Focusing on the gender differences in stress and coping among these couples, and promoting positive coping styles, personalized counselling therapy may assist healthcare professionals in improving the quality of life for couples undergoing infertility treatment.
Download
Pages:38-44
How to cite this article:
Bhavya A P, Divya A P, Rukmani Gharpinde "A cross- sectional study on psychological status of couples with infertility-related stress, and dyadic coping as predictors of quality of life". International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Research, Vol 7, Issue 2, 2025, Pages 38-44
Download Author Certificate

Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.